More Information

Learning Impact 2012 Awards and Recognition Program

Learning Impact 2012
Agenda
Learning Impact Awards
Sponsors
Sponsorship Information
Hotels & Travel & Other Info

What People Are Saying about Learning Impact

"We really enjoyed coming to Learning Impact in May! We all found the conference inspiring and well organized."
Eva Mjøvik
Deputy Director at Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education

"I attended your IMS conference in Barcelona last year which I thought was excellent. One of the most relevant I have been to and great for networking." Richard Horton, Blackboard International

"It was a great opportunity to attend Learning Impact since it gathered the most current relevant projects from the learning technology field. It’s the perfect place to access to what it’s being done, and who is doing it. A deep profitable experience!" Eva de Lera, UOC

"I want to 'felicité' your team for the great work you have done. The meeting was informative, dynamic, ON TIME, and very well balanced. The contacts and he information knowledge were the two obvious factors that influenced every day of this event." Eric G.

"I just wanted to pass on all the wonderful feedback I have heard from all at Cengage that did attend. Everyone has commented not only that it was so worth the time and expense (something that is always in question with tech conferences) but how much they learned and how energized they are by what they saw and heard. " Jeanette W., Cengage

"I wanted to thank you for a great conference - the conference, and IMS membership, provide Icodeon with outstanding networking opportunities. Everyone from IMS was exceptionally informed and helpful in this respect, and I look forward to following up the connections, relationships and leads." Warwick Bailey, Icodeon

"I wanted to say how much I enjoyed the IMS Learning Impact conference. It was the best IMS annual conference I have ever attended. The keynote speakers were interesting and seemed to be able to offer new perspectives on eLearning which I enjoyed. The food and the conference facilities were excellent!"

"IMS Global Learning was a useful and informative conference which broadly delivered on its intention to keep participants focused on the latest innovations in learning systems, digital learning content, the learning enterprise, and open technologies . . . IMS has taken on a new lease of life and this conference confirmed the central role IMS has in shaping and serving the agenda for the development of online learning globally." Julian Clayton, John Wiley

"Learning Impact has evolved into a great conference. It’s large enough to draw the top executives in the learning and publishing industry, but small enough to allow impromptu conversations that simply don’t happen at other conferences." David Smetters, Respondus

Past LIA Award Winners

LIA 2011 Award Winners
LIA 2010 Award Winners
LIA 2009 Award Winners
LIA 2008 Award Winners
LIA 2007 Award Winners

Past Conference Information

Learning Impact 2011
Learning Impact 2010
Learning Impact 2009
Learning Impact 2008
Learning Impact 2007

LI 2012

LIA 2012

SUBMIT A NOMINATION FOR THE UK REGIONAL COMPETITION

The Learning Impact Awards are designed to recognize the most impactful use of technology worldwide in support of learning. This unique program evaluates established, new, and research efforts in context at an implementing learning institution. Finalists will be selected to showcase at the annual Learning Impact conference and a panel of global experts are asked to perform the final rankings at the conference.

See the LEARNING IMPACT 2012 WINNERS

Learning Impact Recognition and Awards Program
Purpose:
The Learning Impact program is facilitated by the IMS Global Learning Consortium (IMS) for the purpose of recognizing outstanding applications of technology that address the most significant challenges facing the global education and training industries.

Thesis:
Improving the quality of and access to education is the global challenge that underpins all other global challenges. Harnessing the potential power of new technologies that can enhance the reach and effectiveness of education is a compelling priority for society. The IMS Global Learning Consortium is a unique collaboration of corporations, educational institutions, and government organizations that can play a significant role in recognizing advances in technology that address key educational challenges worldwide.

Learning Impact Program Process:
Each year the IMS Executive Strategic Council, in coordination with the IMS Board of Directors, looks to identify and award examples of high impact products and services. Submissions are collected based on an open call to industry participants from August to December of each year. A select group of finalists are selected each year in January based on criteria agreed to by the IMS Executive Strategic Council and Board of Directors. The finalists are invited to discuss and demonstrate their projects at the IMS Learning Impact conference and Summit on Global Learning Industry Challenges in April. Participants attending the Learning Impact event will vote on the finalists and the awards will be presented at the conference. The Learning Impact awards are very exclusive. They signify those products, services and implementations that have the greatest impact or potential impact on global learning industry challenges and the greatest potential return on investment.

Submission Types:
Learning Impact awards recognize both the product/service involved as well the exemplary real world implementers as both combine to create the “learning impact”. Therefore, submissions can be made by any product or service provider or end-user educational institution or training provider, as follows:

Product or service provider submitters are asked to name the product(s) and/or service(s) involved as well as a specific implementation (such as University A). Each implementation constitutes a single submission. Product/service companies should submit only one nomination per product/service unless the implementation of the product/service is significantly different.
A nomination can list up to three exemplary implementations.
End-user submitters are asked for the same information, although the product(s) or service(s) may not be commercially available. Each unrelated (not involved in the same implementation project) product or service constitutes a single submission.
Joint projects involving several partners are encouraged to submit as the potential for impact may be greater.

Submission Processing Fee:
Submissions are made in English through a web form available from IMS. The fee is waived for submissions from IMS Contributing Members and for Regional competitions, if agreed to with regional partner. A modest processing fee is charged to non-members of $500 per submission.

Product or Service Maturity:
Each submission is designated in one of three maturity categories: research, new, or established. Submissions must include details on the breadth of deployment.

Research products or services have been prototyped but not deployed operationally. Entries in the research category are evaluated on potential impact.
New products or services have been deployed operationally within the last 12 months and have at least three adopting organizations or multiple users with in an organization. Entries in the new category are evaluated on initial and potential impact.
Established products or services have been deployed for at least 24 months and have at least 10 adopting organizations or multiple users with in an organization. Entries in the established category are evaluated on demonstrated operational impact.

Scale:
Submissions should include the scale of the nomination. Entries should choose from: International solution, Country-wide solution, System or school district solution, Institutional or school solution, Departmental solution

Demonstrator Designee:
Submissions will include designated exemplary implementations such as educational institutions, school districts, or corporate education departments. It is expected that representatives from the exemplary implementations will conduct the demonstrator at the annual conference if selected as a finalist.

Product and Service Categories:
The following table lists the product and service categories in which submissions may be made. Each submission can apply to up to three categories. The list can be amended by suggestion and acceptance by IMS. Product and service categories are only used to classify the submission. Awards will be granted based on overall scoring across all submissions.

Product Categories	Service Categories
Personalization and accessibility	Academic technology outsourcing
Portal	Information technology outsourcing
Course and content management	Student support
Search	Faculty support
Business/institution analytics	Internet-supported learning program launch and support
Program analytics	Assessment
Portfolio	Strategic planning
Assessment	Academic program
Interactive learning environments	Career placement
Classroom capture
Repository
Federated digital content access
Student information system
Portable learning technology
Authoring tool
Coursepaks
Custom publishing
eBooks
Book supplements

Evaluation Criteria:
Each submission will be required to address the following criteria. Medal winners in the global competition from prior years are ineligible.

Criteria
Access	Provides greater access to proven quality learning approaches Enables serving significantly more learners from currently served populations Enables serving new populations of learners (from new/expanded regions, for derivative programs, for preparatory purposes, etc.) Provides greater convenience for learners Enables lifelong learning
Affordability	Enables improved learner efficiency Enables improved instructor efficiency Achieves cost reduction that is passed on to learners Provides education to significant number of disadvantaged learners Saves substantial travel time and cost
Quality	Enables clarity of learning outcomes Improves results in mastery of subject matter as measured by formative or summative assessments Enhances effectiveness of pedagogy or learner engagement Enhances self-directed learning, critical thinking or metacognitive skills Includes or enables integrated assessment or better assessment of student learning by the teacher/faculty
Adoption (For Established Products)	Has achieved mainstream instructor usage Provides large-scale mission-critical 24/7 support Supports institution-wide usage Supports statewide, countrywide, or global usage One of the largest deployments of its kind in terms of learners served
Accountability	Clarifies or helps develop the specifics of accountability Achieves significant cost savings versus prior solution Achieves improvement in retention or graduation rates Provides analytics to understand program and/or institutional/organizational performance Enables comparison across institutions/organizations
Organizational Learning	Supports development of key competencies Supports assessment of key competencies Enables planning or management of competency development Enables more efficient sharing of best practices Provides a distinctive organizational learning advantage
Interoperability	Utilizes open standards for data, content, or services Shares data, content, or services seamlessly with other applications from other vendors at minimal cost Combines best-of-breed products from multiple vendors that share data, content, or services Has enabled and caused practical feedback into the standards process to improve future standards Has been included in IMS GLS testfest events
Innovation (For Research & New Products)	Achieves a far superior realization of other prior products or services of its kind Has clear potential to establish a much needed new category of learning application or tool Incorporates a scientific breakthrough promising enhanced learning based on brain research or learning theory Represents a radical improvement in access, affordability, or quality of education Provides a seamless way to incorporate advanced functionality requiring little or no faculty, teacher, or learner training to use

Judging:
A set of judges will grade the nominations according to their Learning impact relative to the criteria set forth by the Executive Strategic Council. Those nominees with the highest rankings will be selected as finalists. The finalists must showcase their product/service/implementation at the Learning Impact event to maintain their finalist designation. The top Regional Finalists to the IMS GLC Learning Impact Awards will automatically be entered as a finalist at the Learning Impact Event. Contributing Members, Affiliates and Alliance Members may submit an entry free of charge. There is a nominal fee ($500 US) for non-Members.

Recognition and Awards:
At the Learning Impact event, attendees will vote to rank the finalists into platinum, gold, bronze, and silver award levels. A panel of esteemed judges will use the input from attendees to establish the Learning Impact winners.

All finalists will be acknowledged on the site with a link to their offering.