· A learner’s needs and preferences with respect to how the learner can best interact with digital resources, including configuration of assistive technologies. This is represented using the IMS Global Access For All Personal Needs and Preferences (PNP ) v3.0 specification i.e. this document;

· Digital learning resources. This is represented using the IMS Global Access For All Digital Resource Description (DRD ) v3.0 specification [AfADRD, 12];

1.2 Scope and Context

This part of the Access For All specification provides a common language for describing the learner or user needs and preferences when accessing digitally delivered resources or services. This description is one side of a pair of descriptions used in matching user needs and preferences with digital delivery.

The AfA PNP specification is intended to meet the needs of learners with disabilities and of anyone in a disabling context. The purpose of the AfA PNP Specification is to provide a machine-readable method of stating user needs and preferences with respect to digitally based education or learning. The AfA PNP specification can be used independently, for example to deliver the required or desired user interface to the user, or in combination with the Access for All Specification Digital Resource Description [AfADRD, 12] to deliver digital resources that meet a user’s needs and preferences.

1.3 Structure of this Document

The structure of this document is:

2. Personal Needs & Preferences: The underlying data model for the PNP;
3. Information Model: The information model for the components that constitute the PNP;
4. Extending the Specification: An explanation of how the functionality of the specification can be extended using the extension features;
5. Conformance: The expectations for systems, applications and tools that wish to claim compliance to this specification;
Appendix A - The IMS UML Profile Notation: The IMS profile of UML for the platform independent model used to describe an information model.

1.4 Compatibility with Version 2.0

The information models for AfA PNP v2.0 and v3.0 have many similarities but there are many differences. There is no backwards compatibility between versions 2 and 3.

This release of the specification (3.0) is designed to provide a very simple but extensible model and encourage early adoption and implementation. It was initially modeled using a semantic web approach then described using UML to support a particular class of implementations. The range of properties or attributes modeled and their representation is much simpler than in Access For All 2.0 in order to better support those properties identified as important by early adopters of previous versions. As such backwards compatibility with Access For All 2.0 has not been provided for as the team considered it important to establish a simpler way to represent the properties. A number of the properties in Access for All 3.0 have semantic equivalents in AfA2 that could be mapped to their AfA3 versions.

1.5 Nomenclature

AfA Access For All

AfA DRD Access for All Digital Resource Description

AfA PNP Access for All Personal Needs & Preferences

API Application Programming Interface

ARIA Accessible Rich Internet Applications

ASCII American Standard Code for Information Interchange

AT < Assistive Technology

AT-SPI Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface

ATK Accessibility Toolkit

DAISY Digital Accessible Information System

DRD Digital Resource Description

IMS Global IMS Global Learning Consortium Inc.

ISO International Standards Organization

MSAA Microsoft Active Accessibility

NIMAS National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard

OEBPS Open eBook Publication Structure

PDF Portable Document Format

PEF Portable Embosser Format

PIM Platform Independent Model

PNP Personal Needs & Preferences

UML Unified Modeling Language

W3C World Wide Web Consortium

WAI Web Accessibility Initiative

WCAG Web Content Accessibility Guidelines

XML Extensible Mark-up Language

1.6 References

[AfA, 12a] IMS Global Access For All Specification Overview v1.0 , R.Schwerdtfeger, M.Rothberg and C.Smythe, Public Draft, IMS Global Inc., September 2012.

[AfABPIG, 12] IMS Global Access For All v3.0 Best Practices Guide v1.0, R.Schwerdtfeger, M.Rothberg and C.Smythe, Public Draft, IMS Global Inc., September 2012.

[AfADES, 12] IMS Global Access For All v3.0 Data Element Specification v1.0, R.Schwerdtfeger, M.Rothberg and C.Smythe, Pubic Draft IMS Global Inc., September 2012.

[AfADRD, 12] IMS Global Access For All Digital Resource v3.0 Description Information Model v1.0, R.Schwerdtfeger, M.Rothberg and C.Smythe, Public Draft, IMS Global Inc., September 2012.

[ISO639, 98] ISO 639-2:1998 (E/F), Codes for the representation of names of languages — Part 2: Alpha-3 code/Codes pour la représentation des noms de langue — Partie 2: Code alpha-3 .

[RFC4646] RFC 4646: Tags for identifying Languages , A.Phillips and M.Davis, The Internet Society, September 2006.

[WCAG2, 98] W3C /WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 [W3C/WAI WCAG ] , W3C, 1998,
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/ .

2 Personal Needs & Preferences

Figure 2.1 describes the associations between a user, their operating contexts, and their preferences statement. A context for a user describes a set of conditions in which associated Personal Needs and Preferences statement might apply. Conditions might be environmental (such as “it's dark”), might relate to specific information and communications technology or services available (such as “when a Braille display is available”), or might refer to social situations (such as “when my care provider is present”) or other scenarios.

Figure 2.1 Concepts behind personalization.

A list of the properties shown in this diagram is in Table 3.2. Special relationships are described below the image.

Figure 2.2 Personal needs and preferences

Figure 2.2 illustrates the accessibility properties (described here as attributes) and how they relate to each other. [1] These properties would ultimately be used by a resource matching system to deliver a personalized, accessible user experience when matching resources tagged by DRD resource properties. In Figure 2.2, all of the properties are shown but vocabularies for each property are not included, with the exception of AccessModeValue and AdaptationTypeValue , which are shown to illustrate several relationships: accessModeRequired takes accessModeValue as both its existingAccessMode and its adaptationRequest ; adaptationTypeRequired has AccessModeValue as its existingAccessMode and AdaptationTypeValue as its adaptationRequest; and AdaptationTypeValue is related to accessModeValue. The relationship between terms in adaptationTypeValue and terms in accessModeValue is further discussed in Appendix B of the best practice guide [AfABPIG, 12].

3 Information Model

The Platform Independent Model (PIM) for the Access_For_All_User data model [2] is shown in Figure 3.1.

The complete data model is described in the tables that follow.

Figure 3.1 Access_For_All_User class diagram.

Table 3.1 The 'AccessforAll' abstract root class.
Descriptor	Definition
Class name	Access_For_All_User
Class type	Container
Source	N/A
Properties	[ accessForAllUser ]
Description	An abstract class used to indicate that the root ‘Access_For_All_User’ of the data model is the attribute accessForAllUser.

Table 3.2 Description of the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Class name	Access_For_All_User
Class type	Container
Source	Root
Properties	[ accessModeRequired, adaptationTypeRequired, atInteroperable, educationalComplexityOfAdaptation, hazardAvoidance, inputRequirements, languageOfAdaptation, languageOfInterface, adaptationDetailRequired, adaptationMediaRequired, educationalLevelOfAdaptation, extension ], unordered
Description	A collection of information that states how a user prefers digital learning resources to be supplied.

3.1 AccessModeRequired Attribute Description

Table 3.3 The 'accessModeRequired' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	accessModeRequired
Data type	AccessModeRequired (see sub-section 3.13 of this document).
Value space	Container.
Multiplicity	[0 ..unbounded ], unordered
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	Access mode that a user seeks either in an adaptation or an original resource as a replacement for a different access mode.
Notes	This attribute relates an “existingAccessMode” to an access mode that the user prefers, called an “adaptationRequest.” The example of accessModeRequired.existingAccessMode = visual accessModeRequired .adaptationRequest = textual expresses this statement: “Resources that are visual should be replaced by an adaptation that is textual.”

3.2 AdaptationTypeRequired Attribute Description

Table 3.4 The 'adaptationTypeRequired' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	adaptationTypeRequired
Data type	AdaptationTypeRequired (see sub-section 3.14 of this document).
Value space	Container.
Multiplicity	[0 ..unbounded ], unordered
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	Nature or genre of the adaptation required as a replacement for a specific access mode.
Notes	This attribute relates an “existingAccessMode” to an adaptation type that the user prefers, called an “adaptationRequest.” The example of adaptationTypeRequired.existingAccessMode = visual adaptationTypeRequired.adaptationRequest = audioDescription expresses this statement: “Resources that are visual should be replaced by audio description.”

3.3 AtInteroperable Attribute Description

Table 3.5 The 'atInteroperable' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	atInteroperable
Data type	Boolean (see Table A1.1).
Value space	· False – denotes that the user does not require assistive technologies support; · True – denotes that the user does require assistive technologies support.
Multiplicity	[0 .. 1]
Linguistic Indicator	Non-linguistic
Description	A preference for resources that are compatible with assistive technologies.
Notes	Resources that are interoperable with AT should be selected whenever possible. Interoperability is indicated by compliance with WCAG 2.0 checkpoints: 1.1.1, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 2.4.4, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.3.2, 4.1.1 and 4.1.2.The specific details of the AT are normally provided by a user agent or the operating system. The example of ‘atInteroperable= true’ expresses this statement: “Resources that are interoperable with AT should be selected whenever possible”.

3.4 EducationalComplexityOfAdaptation Attribute Description

Table 3.6 The 'educationalComplexityOfAdaptation' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	educationalComplexityOfAdaptation
Data type	EducationalComplexityValue (see sub-section 2.8 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[0 .. 1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	A preference for a resource that is simplified or enriched relative to another resource that presents the same intellectual content.
Notes	The example of ‘educationalComplexityOfAdaptation= simplified’ expresses this statement: “Resources that are presented in a simplified form should be selected whenever possible.”

3.5 HazardAvoidance Attribute Description

Table 3.7 The'hazardAvoidance' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	hazardAvoidance
Data type	HazardValue (see sub-section 2.9 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[0 ..unbounded ], unordered
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	A resource having such a characteristic should not be delivered to a user with this preference.
Notes	The example of ‘hazardAvoidance= flashing’ expresses this statement: “Resources that include flashing visuals should never be presented.”

3.6 InputRequirements Attribute Description

Table 3.8 The 'inputRequirements' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	inputRequirements
Data type	ControlFlexibilityValue (see sub-section 2.6 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[0 .. 1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	Single input system that is sufficient to control a resource.
Notes	The example of ‘inputRequirements= fullKeyboardControl’ expresses this statement: “Resources that are fully usable with keyboard control should be selected whenever possible.”

3.7 LanguageOfAdaptation Attribute Description

Table 3.9 The 'languageOfAdaptation' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	languageOfAdaptation
Data type	NormalizedString
Value space	See Table A1.1.
Multiplicity	[0 ..unbounded ], unordered
Linguistic Indicator	Non-linguistic
Description	A preference for the language of the adaptation [RFC4646].
Notes	The example of ‘languageOfAdaptation= spa’ expresses this statement: “Resources in Spanish should be selected whenever possible”.

3.8 LanguageOfInterface Attribute Description

Table 3.10 The 'languageOfInterface' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	languageOfInterface
Data type	NormalizedString
Value space	See Table A1.1.
Multiplicity	[0 ..unbounded ], unordered
Linguistic Indicator	Non-linguistic
Description	A preference for the language of the user interface [RFC4646].
Notes	The example of ‘languageOfInterface= spa’ expresses this statement: “User interfaces should be presented in Spanish whenever possible.”

3.9 AdaptationDetailRequired Attribute Description

Table 3.11 The 'adaptationDetailRequired' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	adaptationDetailRequired
Data type	AdaptationDetailRequired (see sub-section 3.15 of this document).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[0 ..unbounded ], unordered
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	Fine detail of one or more required adaptation types.
Notes	This attribute relates an “existingAccessMode” to an adaptation detail that the user prefers, called an “adaptationRequest.” The example of adaptationDetailRequired.existingAccessMode = auditory adaptationDetailRequired.adaptationRequest = verbatim expresses this statement: “Resources that are auditory should be replaced by verbatim alternatives.” Comment on the relationship between this attribute and its terms, and the other attributes and their terms, is especially invited.

3.10 AdaptationMediaRequired Attribute Description

Table 3.12 The 'adaptationMediaRequired' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	adaptationMediaRequired
Data type	AdaptationMediaRequired (see sub-section 3.16 of this document).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[0 ..unbounded ], unordered
Linguistic Indicator	Non-linguistic
Description	Requirement for a particular type of media.
Notes	This attribute relates an “existingAccessMode” to an adaptation media that the user prefers, called an “adaptationRequest.” The example of adaptationMediaRequired.existingAccessMode = textual adaptationMediaRequired.adaptationRequest = NIMAS expresses this statement: “Resources that are textual should be replaced by NIMAS-based alternatives.” Comment on the relationship between this attribute and its terms, and the other attributes and their terms, is especially invited.

3.11 EducationalLevelOfAdaptation Attribute Description

Table 3.13 The 'educationalLevelOfAdaptation' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	educationalLevelOfAdaptation
Data type	NormalizedString
Value space	See Table A1.1.
Multiplicity	[0 .. *], unordered
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	A preference for the education level of the adaptation.
Notes	The example of ‘educationalLevelOfAdaptation=Grade5’ expresses this statement: “Resources that match education level Grade 5 should be selected whenever possible” when used in conjunction with the ASN Educational Level Vocabulary.

3.12 Extension Attribute Description

Table 3.14 The 'extension' attribute for the Access_For_All_User class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	extension
Data type	Unspecified
Value space	Defined in terms of how the Information Model is realized by a binding.
Multiplicity	[0 ..unbounded ], unordered
Linguistic Indicator	N/A
Description	This is a placeholder. It informs bindings of this Information Model as to the valid locations for the inclusion that extend the parent class.
Notes	The form of the extension is dependent on the type of binding.

3.13 AccessModeRequired Class Description

The PIM for the ‘AccessModeRequired ’ class is shown in Figure 3.1.

Table 3.15 Description of the 'AccessModeRequired' class.
Descriptor	Definition
Class name	AccessModeRequired
Class type	Container
Source	Access_For_All_User
Properties	[ existingAccessMode, adaptationRequest ]
Description	The container for the domain space and range space information for this class.
Notes

3.13.1 ‘ExistingAccessMode ’ Attribute Description

Table 3.16 The 'existingAccessMode' attribute for the AccessModeRequired class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	existingAccessMode
Data type	AccessModeValue (see sub-section 2.2 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	The domain space for the ‘AccessModeRequired’ class.

3.13.2 ‘AdaptationRequest ’ Attribute Description

Table 3.17 The 'adaptationRequest' attribute for the AccessModeRequired class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	adaptationRequest
Data type	AccessModeValue (see sub-section 2.2 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	The value space for the ‘AccessModeRequired’ class.

3.14 AdaptationTypeRequired Class Description

The PIM for the ‘AdaptationTypeRequired’ class is shown in Figure 3.1.

Table 3.18 Description of the 'AdaptationTypeRequired' class.
Descriptor	Definition
Class name	AdaptationTypeRequired
Class type	Container
Source	Access_For_All_User
Properties	[ existingAccessMode, adaptationRequest ]
Description	The container for the domain space and range space information for this class.
Notes	This attribute uses different vocabularies for its domain and range.

3.14.1 ‘ExistingAccessMode ’ Attribute Description

Table 3.19 The 'existingAccessMode' attribute for the AdaptationTypeRequired class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	existingAccessMode
Data type	AccessModeValue (see sub-section 2.2 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	The domain space for the ‘AdapationTypeRequired’ class.

3.14.2 ‘AdaptationRequest ’ Attribute Description

Table 3.20 The 'adaptationRequest' attribute for the AdaptationTypeRequired class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	adaptationRequest
Data type	AdaptationTypeValue (see sub-section 2.5 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	The value space for the ‘AdaptationTypeRequired’ class.

3.15 AdaptationDetailRequired Class Description

The PIM for the ‘AdaptationDetailRequired’ class is shown in Figure 3.1.

Table 3.21 Description of the 'AdaptationDetailRequired' class.
Descriptor	Definition
Class name	AdaptationDetailRequired
Class type	Container
Source	Access_For_All_User
Properties	[ existingAccessMode, adaptationRequest ]
Description	The container for the domain space and range space information for this class.
Notes	This attribute uses different vocabularies for its domain and range. Comment on the relationship between this attribute and its terms, and the other attributes and their terms, is especially invited.

3.15.1 ‘ExistingAccessMode ’ Attribute Description

Table 3.22 The 'existingAccessMode' attribute for the AdaptationDetailRequired class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	existingAccessMode
Data type	AccessModeValue (see sub-section 2.2 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	The domain space for the ‘AdapationDetailRequired’ class.

3.15.2 ‘AdaptationRequest ’ Attribute Description

Table 3.23 The 'adaptationRequest' attribute for the AdaptationDetailRequired class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	adaptationRequest
Data type	AdaptationDetailValue (see sub-section 2.4 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	The value space for the ‘AdaptationDetailRequired’ class.

3.16 AdaptationMediaRequired Class Description

The PIM for the ‘AdaptationMediaRequired’ class is shown in Figure 3.1.

Table 3.24 Description of the 'AdaptationMediaRequired' class.
Descriptor	Definition
Class name	AdaptationMediaRequired
Class type	Container
Source	Access_For_All_User
Properties	[ existingAccessMode, adaptationRequest ]
Description	The container for the domain space and range space information for this class.
Notes	This attribute uses different vocabularies for its domain and range. Comment on the relationship between this attribute and its terms, and the other attributes and their terms, is especially invited.

3.16.1 ‘ExistingAccessMode ’ Attribute Description

Table 3.25 The 'existingAccessMode' attribute for the AdaptationMediaRequired class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	existingAccessMode
Data type	AccessModeValue (see sub-section 2.2 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	The domain space for the ‘AdapationMediaRequired’ class.

3.16.2 ‘AdaptationRequest ’ Attribute Description

Table 3.26 The 'adaptationRequest' attribute for the AdaptationMediaRequired class.
Descriptor	Definition
Attribute name	adaptationRequest <
Data type	AdaptationMediaTypeValue (see sub-section 2.3 in AfA DES [AfADES, 12]).
Value space	Container
Multiplicity	[1]
Linguistic Indicator	Linguistic
Description	The value space for the ‘AdaptationDetailRequired’ class.

4 Extending the Specification

The specification may only be extended as permitted in the information model. The form of the extension is dependent on the binding being used (see the corresponding binding documentation and best practice recommendations [AfA, 12a]).

The value space for each of the vocabularies is approved by IMS Global. The value space for a vocabulary may be extended. Such extensions may be created and used only when no approved IMS Global value satisfies the expressive need of an implementing community to define the shape of a collection.

5 Conformance

The requirements for conformance to the AfA PNP specification are dependent on the function or role played by the conformant technology or application.

Education delivery applications, agents or systems are conformant to this part of the Access For All Specification when they gather and/or process Personal Needs and Preferences statements.

Alternative access systems are conformant to this part of Access For All Specification when they respond to the generic elements of this standard that apply to the specific class of alternative access systems to which the system belongs e.g. screen readers would respond to screen reader elements. In general, conformance will be to a profile of the specification. The associated conformance requirements are described in the corresponding profile documentation.

Appendix A – The IMS UML Profile Notation

The AfA PNP Information Models are expressed using the standard IMS Global representation in the Unified Modeling Language (UML). Classes in this information model are classified into one of four stereotypes. These abstractions are bound to specific data structures for machine processing in the associated bindings. The abstract class types are:

· Container: A container class may be an association parent of one or more association child classes. The ‘Unordered’ container does not require the order of the contained attributes to be maintained, the ‘Sequence’ container denotes information whose order must be maintained and the ‘Selection’ container denotes a selection of the contained attributes;

· RequirementRelationship : A container for a class that defines the domain (existingAccessMode) and range (adaptationRequest) of the associated attribute. In this specification both the domain and range are an enumerated vocabulary;

· Value: A value class shall only be a attribute of primitive type. That is, it shall not be a composite of container, value, or unspecified class types. A value class shall always be a child of a container class and shall have semantic value within the scope of its parent class’s semantic value;

· PrimitiveType: This is a class that is used to denote a basic data-type for the specification;

· Unspecified: An unspecified class may be a parent. An unspecified class serves as an extension point for this Information Model.

Table A1.1 Class and Attribute descriptors
Descriptor	Definition
Class name	The name given to the class being described.
Class type	The abstract class type of this class.
Data type (Range)	For value classes, the allowed structure for valid values for the class. Valid data types are: Boolean: The primitive, two-valued data type that uses the keywords “true” and “false” to indicate the logical state of an object. NormalizedString: A sequence of printable characters that does not contain carriage returns or tabs. There is no length constraint.
Value space (Domain)	The range of valid values for this class. If the value space is unspecified, it is not known or is not important. This value space must be defined in terms of the associated data-type.
Multiplicity	A property of a class indicating the number of times it may be used or appear in a given parent context. The values of this property are expressed as a range or shorthand for a range using this notation: ‘0 .. 1’ [optional; restricted] ‘0 ..unbounded’ [optional; unrestricted] ‘1 .. 1’ [mandatory; restricted] ‘1 ..unbounded’ [mandatory; unrestricted] Multiplicities may also appear in short-hand notation in the UML models. The short-hand equivalents shall be (exclusive of bracketed comments): ‘’ [ optional ; unrestricted] ‘1’ [mandatory; restricted] ‘1 .. ’ [ mandatory ; unrestricted] Where multiplicity is greater than one, the importance of the ordering of siblings is also indicated by appending either “,”ordered or “,” unordered. ordered specifies a sequence of siblings as listed, unordered specifies a collection or bag of siblings for which the order is not important.
Linguistic Indicator	· Linguistic. · Non-linguistic.
Scope	The scope of the attribute is define as either: · ‘-‘ denotes local; · ‘+’ denotes global. The appropriate symbol precedes the name of the attribute.
Source	Lists classes that may be parents of this class.
Properties	Lists the possible child classes of this class in the form “[” child “,” child “]”. One or more child classes may be expressed within square brackets. Each child class shall be separated by a comma . Where more than one child is listed, the importance of the ordering of siblings is also indicated by appending either “,”ordered* or “,” unordered. ordered specifies a sequence of siblings as listed. unordered specifies a collection or bag of sibling for which the order is not important.
Description	Contains descriptions relating to the class and its values space.
Notes	Supporting information.

In general, this specification does not define the ways in which an end system must be realized. However, the required interoperability behavior requires that an end system have certain characteristics. The static properties of these characteristics are defined in this Section, including:

· When an attribute has a multiplicity of ‘1 .. 1’, an end system must be capable of supporting one instance;

· When an attribute has a multiplicity of ‘1 .. *’, an end system must be capable of supporting at least one instance. The specification will also define the smallest permitted maximum number of instances that must also be supported by the end system;

· When an attribute has a multiplicity of ‘0 .. 1’, an end system should support a single instance;

· When an attribute has a multiplicity of ‘0 .. *’, the specification will define the smallest permitted maximum number of instances that must also be supported by the end system.

About This Document

Title: IMS Global Access For All Personal Needs & Preferences (PNP ) Specification Information Model

Editor: Colin Smythe (IMS Global)

Co-chairs: Madeleine Rothberg (WGBH) and Richard Schwerdtfeger (IBM)

Version: 3.0

Version Date : 13 September 2012

Release : 1.0

Status: Public Draft

Summary: This document contains the IMS Global Access For All Personal Needs & Preferences Specification Information Model v3.0. This part of the Access For All specification provides a description of a learner’s functional abilities and the assistive technology or other non-standard technology in use as well as other user preferences.

Revision Information: This version supersedes the IMS Global Access For All v2.0 specification. This document contains the information model description for the Access for All Personal Needs & Preferences.

Purpose : This document is made available for adoption by the public community at large.

Document Location: http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/

List of Contributors

The following individuals contributed to the development of this document:

Revision History
Version No.	Release Date	Comments
Public Draft v1.0	13 September 2012	The first formal release of the AfA PNP Public Draft.

[1] The words attribute and property are used interchangeably in this specification.

[2] In this section the term “attribute” is a UML term. We are using this to refer to a property of a digital resource. A ‘Container’ is a stereotyped UML class used to denote a complex data structure.